Skip to main content

Why Islamic Terrorism Is Unique In Our Time

Islamic Terrorism is Unique in our Time

Islamic terrorism is defined as  a form of religious terrorism[1] committed by extremists of Islam for the purpose of achieving varying political and/or religious ends. Now many posts have targeted the term saying it to be discriminatory. Well, it is true. It is discriminatory. But you know why? Because they should be discriminated against. It is a security mechanism. I am not going to say that morally it is something right to do. But personally it is unavoidable if you live in a country with a sizable Muslim population. 


What sets Islamic Terrorism apart from other forms of Terrorism?


I read an amazing post here. This point has been repeated in many places. They are indeed true and thought provoking, but the comparison is not justifiable. Islamic terrorism terrorizes with a specific purpose - to establish terror in the hearts of kafirs and by subversive means 'guide' them to the 'true path' of Islam. The ultimate objective is the establishment of Islamic supremacy all over the world. 

Let us talk about LTTE - this terrorist organization demanded a separate nation for Tamils in Sri Lanka. They had been killing, maiming, assassinating people for about two decades. After that they ran out of steam and got overrun by the Sri Lankan Army. 


Q. Were they terrorists? 

A. Hell, yes, they were. 

Q. Were they Hindu? 

A. Sure, they were.

Q. So they were Hindu Terrorists, right?

A. Wrong. They were evil but they never tried to establish Hindu supremacy over Sri Lanka, let alone the world. They demanded for a separate Tamil motherland. They did not commit genocide on Buddhists anywhere. There were no mass forced conversions. They fought for land. Not religion.

Let us talk about Hindutva parties in India


Q. Are they radical?

A. Certainly, Bajrang Dal certainly is. The rest have mellowed down over the years, some becoming political parties - contesting(and losing) elections.

Q. Are they violent?

A. Quite often. They do attack missionaries, and other people all over the country.

Q. Are they terrorist?

A. Officially no. But a few of them are. In the true sense of the word.

Q. Are they Hindu terrorists?

A. To a very minor extent. The organizations themselves have not claimed any responsibility. A handful have been arrested and they have been promptly removed from party positions. They don't wish to establish a Hindu world either. They do not kill Muslims and Christians in trains, don't ram aeroplanes into buildings,  behead people and record it. They are not considered a threat to peace. Especially because they exist only in India. They are not interested in saving Hindus in say Uganda. Unlike al Qaida, the RSS does not shed tears for the lack of Hindus in say, England. It is like Jewish organizations working in Israel. Of course, if some Jewish Organization works in Palestine, it can be dangerous, but in Israel it is understood if not justified. Even then, in Hindu majority India also, RSS is seen in bad light and very few respectable people have owned up to supporting it in public.


Now let's talk about the Basques or Irish Terrorists

This topic has come up very frequently in many speeches given my Islamic apologetics. The claim is that they were Christian terrorists. The pattern is ridiculous. They were Christians. They were terrorists too, but they had no similarity with say the Jaish e Muhammad has with Lashkar e Taiba. The ultimate objective was not the establishment of Christianity. Indeed the countries they were fighting were Christians anyway. It was based only on the independence of their land. 

Q. OK, so what's about Kashmir?

A. Well, I could have considered Kashmir as a 'freedom struggle' but cannot. 

Q. Why? 


A. Because Kashmir used to be (and still is) a composite culture. The land was Hindu about 6 centuries ago as well. The name is still Kashmir - founded by Kashyap Muni as said in folklore. The Kashmiri Hindu community is completely wiped out. Under such circumstances, if some Kashmiri Muslims(who have an established history of Pakistani sponsors) demand "azaad'" and at the same time order Kashmiri Hindus to leave Kashmir and go to "India", I can not in good conscience call that as a call for freedom. It is a form of demographic genocide to make Kashmir Hindufrei - free of Hindus.


I have really thought a lot about this topic. If you have any thoughts please comment below, but attacking anyone on the basis of religion will not be tolerated - be a Hindu, Muslim or otherwise.

Comments

  1. wonderful blog checkout my blog at
    http://sa4me.blogspot.com/2012/10/about-south-africa.html#comment-form
    feel free to leave a comment

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

No spam please :)

Popular posts from this blog

Republic of India's sustained discrimination of Hindus

Republic of India has been independent for over 70 years now. Ever since 1947, and particularly since 1950 many Governments have come and gone. The Constitution of India has been amended. By over 370 times and counting. The name of the nation has also changed. From the simple 'Republic of India' it was changed to the 'Secular Sovereign Socialist Democratic Republic of India' for reasons best known to the then ruling elites. Few policies have remained unchanged or unchallenged regardless of the different Governments, political parties, emergencies and so on.

That is the systematic institutional and legal discrimination of Hindus.

Sounds surprising?

And yes, BJP fanboys - you are just as guilty if not more. Let me explain why.

There are plenty of laws, rules and regulations that this marvellous Republic of ours has given us. Learning about the laws that govern our lives require us to take a Law degree. Literally. The Constitution that we are bound to live by is somethin…

Fallen - Based on a true story (almost)

A group of young guys had gathered around a lifeless body on the road. A minivan had just hit a girl and sped off. The girl bounced on the road and rolled around once and came to a stop. The rest of the girls on the street scattered. A couple of guys came to check on the girl. A crowd gathered and collected what little valuables she had left with her.

A girl saw it all from her second floor window on Sheil road, Liverpool. Natalie was aware of the hazards of what she used to do. She knew the roads were dangerous, especially at night. But then, day or night - she was never truly safe. Her escape was only in heroin. She did not dare to build a world of her own by her own means. She tried before. It never worked out. So she had transferred the responsibility to what society calls ‘substance’. Heroin gave her a cushion, her sleep and let her keep her sanity. Or so she used to think.

Natalie was alone. Her addiction was not. It came with dependence, depression, homelessness and rejection. He…

A Good Day

I have a beautiful small house in the hills. It is about 3 km from Manali, in Himachal Pradesh. It is not much. Probably calling it a cottage is stretching it too far. I have got a couple of bedrooms, a small drawing room cum kitchen where we dine as well. There is storage and a small garage that is mostly empty. I have got another small room with just a single bed and a study built on the first floor. It is just about ten feet by ten feet but it has got a retractable ceiling and a wall made of glass with the rest of the roof being something of a balcony. This is the place where I like to spend most of my time. x

In the front, there is a garden with some flowers in the front and trees lining the boundary wall. My mother has planted a few vegetables in the back that we regularly use in the kitchen. We mostly require only rice and eggs from the market.

A typical day starts with me waking up and going for a morning stroll. I often spend my nights in the room on the roof. So the first thing…