Skip to main content

Indian Partition - The Forgotten Question

The Partition of India was a terrible catastrophe. There is no doubt about that. Millions were killed, displaced, thousands were raped, orphaned etc. All this was done in a space of a few months. Mobs frantically killed each other for life, religion, property, identity, revenge and any other reason they could then think of. Even since the call for Direct Action, there was no doubt about a serious religious conflict. What followed was an eventual ethnic cleansing of parts of India of non Muslims and Muslims. How it happened, what happened, how trains full of dead bodies piled up on each side of new borders is well known. Hundreds of books have been written, research over decades have been published. We know all that.

The basic idea of it all was simple - Jinnah believed Hindus and Muslims are two separate nations and the latter should have a distinct political entity for themselves, based on Islam, their faith. To identify this they had to prove one thing. That the All India Muslim League had the support of the majority of Muslims. This was largely possible because of a genius policy - one of separate electorates. This concept has been carried over to modern Republic of India, possibly ushering in countless more conflicts in the present and near future. But that's another story for another time.
1946 - 'The Great Calcutta Killings'. Bengal was under AIML rule at that point of time.

The Indian National Congress claimed itself to be representative of all Indians, regardless of faith. The 1937 Indian elections showed some good results (for Congress). Under Jawaharlal Nehru, the INC won 707 seats and the AIML won only 106 seats. [1] [2] Naturally, the Congress was bullish and felt that the Muslims were sufficiently in their favor to continue the trend. The provincial results can be obtained from the Wiki page.

In the last decade, since the Pakistan Resolution or Lahore Resolution, slogans of Vande Mataram and Jai Hind were being made to make way for ones like 'Chin ke lengay Pakistan', 'Lekay rahengay Pakistan' etc. Of course, I wish not to mention the more anti Hindu ones in this case, but the rabidly honest communal-ization of politics was pretty much well underway.

Then came the 1946 elections. AIML fought with a single agenda - that of Pakistan and INC fought on Independence with Unity. This was just after the conclusion of the Second World War. The British were anxious to get out without losing face. To appeal to the Muslims (obvious appeasement), Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was the Party President for INC and Jinnah for AIML. Here was what the results came out to be.

923 seats went to the INC and only 425 went to the AIML. INC got 58+% of the vote share. In contrast BJP today rules India with a combined share (with NDA) of about 39%. Besides most of present day India, INC won NWFP (currently Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA in Pakistan) while the AIML won Bengal and Sindh.

So you may wonder - this was a clear defeat, was it not?

Not so fast. In reality, the AIML never wanted to win the election. They fought on the plank of Islam and a separate nation for those following it. And they proved their point - that they alone overwhelmingly represented Indian Muslims. [3]

The fact remains that the vast vast majority of Indian Muslims voted for a separate country (in excess of 74.75%) [4]

Which brings me to the question - I have saved it for the last.

Let us assume that 70%+ Muslims (an absolute majority of Muslims) vote for Pakistan, breaking India. Even then, Muslims comprised only 24% of the total Indian population.

What did the Hindus, the Sikhs, the Buddhists, the Parsis, and others have to say in the matter? It is obvious that the entire non Muslim population overwhelmingly voted for the Indian National Congress and other non sectarian parties. Why was this majority vote totally ignored? Did the voice of the Muslims count much much more than the rest of India's population?

I am not sure if the question is genuine or just rhetorical.

Update: I am not exactly against the Partition. I consider myself a realist. The Partition was inevitable, the industrial scale riots could possible have been minimized. But that is another story all together.

Sources -
[1] Joseph E. Schwartzberg. "Schwartzberg Atlas". A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Retrieved 2012-04-05.
[2] Reeves, P. D. (1971). "Changing Patterns of Political Alignment in the General Elections to the United Provinces Legislative Assembly, 1937 and 1946". Modern Asian Studies. 5 (2): 111–142
[3] Nadeem Paracha, Dawn, "The Election That Created Pakistan", http://www.dawn.com/news/1105473/the-election-that-created-pakistan - Retrieved 2014-05-11
[4] Ramchandra Guha, India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy

Popular posts from this blog

Salesmen of God

Christian evangelicals are similar to parasites[1]. The similarities are simply astounding. Among all predatory religions, Evangelical Christianity has done, by far, the greatest harm to humankind[2]. Like leeches, the Evangelical sucks the lifeblood of an unchristian society till it descends either into chaos and incessant civil conflict or the relegation of the culture to the pages of history(Bowden, 1985). Even in the 21st century this unashamed activity continues(Bhosle, 2003).[3]
Evangelicals usually have a similar methodology when it comes to proselytization. Like parasites, the target is usually one belonging to the most vulnerable section of society. This does not necessarily mean that they try harvesting only the most down trodden of the society(Kelly, 2001). And most certainly, the objective is never the upliftment of the persons involved. The target groups may, for example, belong to ethnic minorities, refugees (both economic and political), caste groups, the poor and the si…

Ali The Kargil Boy

I met Ali in the Leh airport,he drove us in our hotel. The very next morning we went for sightseeing. He used to drive very fast. I repeatedly told him to drive slow, he followed for  a short time; again continued in his own speed.
On the way to Nubra valley the road was very stiff and the altitude was very high. As I was sick before our tour it was difficult for me to bear that fast ride.After coming back I complained our tour  operator for his driving and asked for another driver.




Our tour operator assured me that he would tell him to drive  comfortably.The next day Ali came drove the car and I enjoyed my entire remaining  trip.
Sometimes he used to push the accelerator and I just told "Ali.....ahista"...he became consous. We used to chat during this long drive. I asked him "How old are you Ali?he replied "22years mam."He told me "At the age of 16 I started driving without lisence,I used to drive big vehicles ,now I drive tourist cars during the seas…

When birds come home

It is mid March in Mumbai. It is supposed to be hot and humid. As it usually is all the year round with monsoon and December exceptions.
But it's cloudy today. To be fair, yesterday was also cloudy but today is dark. As dark as it usually is just before a downpour. It may rain and I don't have an umbrella with me. It's not that a change of weather is bad. I like rains. But the suddenness is rather strange.
I am not the only one confused with the weather change. The birds seem to be totally messed up by the onset of darkness. It was about 9 AM in the morning. The birds had just perched on the trees for their daily routine. The cloud came. They possibly understood that to be the beginning of the evening and end of day. Next thing I know, I see hundreds (yes, literally hundreds) of birds rushing back to their nests.
This is not a unique scene. I have seen this umpteen number of times in the monsoons. This is the first time I have noticed it in March (as far as I can remember) an…